[1] Allen, C. R., Angeler, D. G., Garmestani, A. S., Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2014). Panarchy: theory and application. Ecosystems, 17, 578-589.
Allen, M. A., Flynn, M. E., & Martinez Machain, C. (2022). US global military deployments, 1950–2020. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(3), 351-370.
Almäng, J. (2019). War, vagueness and hybrid war. Defence Studies, 19(2), 189-204.
Aning, E. K. (2004). Investing in peace and security in Africa: the case of ECOWAS. Conflict, Security & Development, 4(3), 533-542.
Antonenko, S. (2017). Functioning Features of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Management System in a Hybrid Warfare. Paper presented at the Information dimension of hybrid warfare: the experience of Ukraine, materials of the international scientific-practical conference. Kyiv: The National Defence University of Ukraine.
Azad, T. M., & Haider, M. W. (2020). Deterrence in Realm of Grey Zone Warfare. Journal of Indian Studies, 6(2), 285-304.
Bachmann, S., Putter, D., & Duczynski, G. (2023). Hybrid warfare and disinformation: A Ukraine war perspective. Global Policy, 14(23), 3-5.
Balcaen, P., Bois, C. D., & Buts, C. (2022). A game-theoretic analysis of hybrid threats. Defence and Peace Economics, 33(1), 26-41.
Balcaen, P., Du Bois, C., & Buts, C. (2021). Sharing the Burden of Hybrid Threats: Lessons from the Economics of Alliances. Defence and Peace Economics, 1-18.
Brands, H. (2016). Paradoxes of the gray zone. Available at SSRN 2737593.
Bratko, A., Zaharchuk, D., & Zolka, V. (2021). Hybrid warfare–a threat to the national security of the state. Revista de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional, 7(1), 147-160.
Brown, J. (2018). An alternative war: The development, impact, and legality of hybrid warfare conducted by the nation state. Journal of Global Faultlines, 5(1-2), 58-82.
Caliskan, M. (2019). Hybrid warfare through the lens of strategic theory. Defense & security analysis, 35(1), 40-58.
Cebrowski, A. K., & Garstka, J. J. (1998). Network-centric warfare: Its origin and future. Paper presented at the US Naval Institute Proceedings.
Cîrdei, I. A., & Ispas, L. (2017). A possible answer of the European Union to Hybrid Threats. Scientific Bulletin-Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy, 22(2), 71-78.
Coldea, F. (2022). Intelligence challenges in countering hybrid threats. National security and the future, 23(1), 49-66.
Dowse, A., & Bachmann, S.-D. (2019). Explainer: what is ‘hybrid warfare’and what is meant by the ‘grey zone’? The Conversation, 17.
Ellis, G. F., & Di Sia, P. (2023). Complexity Theory in Biology and Technology: Broken Symmetries and Emergence. Symmetry, 15(10), 1945.
Fägersten, B. (2016). Forward Resilience in the Age of Hybrid Threats: The Role of European Intelligence. Forward Resilience: Protecfing Society in an Interconnected World, 113-126.
Filippidou, A. (2020). Deterrence: Concepts and Approaches for Current and Emerging Threats. In Deterrence (pp. 1-18): Springer.
Ghasemi, F. Conceptual Reconstruction of Regional Deterrence Theory and Designing Its Patterns on the Basis of the Theories of Power Cycles and Networks.”. Defensive Strategy, 38, 103-146.
Ghasemi, F. (2012). CONCEPTUAL RECONSTRUCTION OF REGIONAL DETERRENCE THEORY AND DESIGNING OF ITS MODELS BY THE USE OF POWER CYCLE AND NETWORK THEORIES.
Ghasemi, F. (2019). Complexity-Chaos Theory and War in International Relations. In: University of Tehran Press.
Ghasemi, F. (2022a). Power and International Politics Tehran University of Tehran
Ghasemi, F. (2022b). A Step Towards the Theoretical Model of Dissipated and Bifurcated Order in the New International Politics. Geopolitics Quarterly, 18(65), 289-314.
Ghasemi, F. (2022c). Theoretical Requirements of Deterrence in Complex-Chaotic International Systems: A Step towards a New Theory of Nonlinear Deterrence. Political Strategic Studies, 10(39), 141-174.
Giumelli, F., Cusumano, E., & Besana, M. (2018). From strategic communication to sanctions: the European Union’s approach to hybrid threats. In A civil-military response to hybrid threats (pp. 145-167): Springer.
Hicks, K. H., & Friend, A. H. (2019). By Other Means Part I: Campaigning in the Gray Zone: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hindrén, R., & Smith, H. (2022). Understanding and Countering Hybrid Threats through a Comprehensive and Multinational Approach. The Academic-Practitioner Divide in Intelligence Studies, 35, 147.
Hoffman, F. G. (2007). Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars (Arlington. VA: Potomac.
Iskandarov, K. (2021). The DETERRENCE AS A COMPONENT OF RESPONSE TO HYBRID THREATS (THE SOUTH CAUCASUS AS A FOCAL POINT). Civitas et Lex, 29(1), 17-26.
Isnard, C., & Zeeman, E. C. (2019). Some models from catastrophe theory in the social sciences. In Use Of Models Soc Science (pp. 44-100): Routledge.
Linkov, I., Baiardi, F., Florin, M.-V., Greer, S., Lambert, J. H., Pollock, M., . . . Thorisson, H. (2019). Applying resilience to hybrid threats. IEEE Security & Privacy, 17(5), 78-83.
Lutz, C. (2015). US Foreign Military Bases: The Edge and Essence of Empire. In Rethinking America (pp. 15-30): Routledge.
Mallory, K. (2018). Power and International Politics Rand Corporation.
Manson, S. M. (2001). Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32(3), 405-414.
Matisek, J. W. (2017). Shades of gray deterrence: Issues of fighting in the gray zone. Journal of Strategic Security, 10(3), 1-26.
Mazarr, M. J. (2015). Mastering the gray zone: understanding a changing era of conflict. Retrieved from
McKelvey, B. (2004). Complexity science as order-creation science: New theory, new method. EMERGENCE-MAHWAH-LAWRENCE ERLBAUM-, 6(4), 2.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2016). The case for offshore balancing: A superior US grand stategy. Foreign Aff., 95, 70.
Monaghan, S. (2019). Countering hybrid warfare. Prism, 8(2), 82-99.
Morris, L. J., Mazarr, M. J., Hornung, J. W., Pezard, S., Binnendijk, A., & Kepe, M. (2019). Gaining Competitive Advantage in the Gray Zone: Response Options for Coercive Aggression Below the Threshold of Major War. Retrieved from
Mousavi, S. M., & Ghasemi, F. (2024). Networked Wars and Deterrence, Case Study: Islamic Republic of Iran. Political Strategic Studies, 13(50), 175-212. doi:10.22054/qpss.2023.75510.3303
Mumford, A., & Carlucci, P. (2023). Hybrid warfare: The continuation of ambiguity by other means. European Journal of International Security, 8(2), 192-206.
Patrick, C., Cristina, J., Georgios, K., Käsper, K., Magnus, N., AndrAs, R., & Josef, S. (2021). The landscape of Hybrid Threats: A Conceptual Model (Public Version).
Quirós, C. T. (2021). Strategic communications as a key factor in countering hybrid threats.
Qureshi, W. A. (2020). The rise of hybrid warfare. Notre Dame J. Int'l Comp. L., 10, 173.
Sato, T., & Tanimura, H. (2016). The Trajectory Equifinality Model (TEM) as a general tool for understanding human life course within irreversible time. Making of the future: The trajectory equifinality approach in cultural psychology, 21-42.
Schmid, J. (2021). Introduction to Hybrid Warfare–A Framework for comprehensive Analysis. In Hybrid Warfare (pp. 11-32): Springer.
Smith, H. (2019). Countering hybrid threats. Democracy, 95(2), 255-277.
Snetselaar, D., & Rietjens, S. Understanding Western Perceptions of War and Insecurity: Unravelling Hybridity. In Routledge Handbook of the Future of Warfare (pp. 155-165): Routledge.
Svetoka, S. (2016). Social media as a tool of hybrid warfare: NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence.
Takahashi, S. (2018). Development of gray-zone deterrence: concept building and lessons from Japan’s experience. The Pacific Review, 31(6), 787-810.
Treverton, G. F., Thvedt, A., Chen, A. R., Lee, K., & McCue, M. (2018). Addressing hybrid threats. In: Försvarshögskolan (FHS).
Troxell, J. F. (2012). Military power and the use of force. US Army War College Guide to National Security Policy and Strategy, 187-210.
Vitalie, S. (2020). Hybrid Threats: Modern Perception and Tactics. Studia Securitatis, 37.
Weissmann, M. (2021). Conceptualizing and countering hybrid threats and hybrid warfare: The role of the military in the grey zone.
Williamson, S. C. (2009). From fourth Generation Warfare to hybrid war: US Army War College.
Yeo, A. I. (2017). The politics of overseas military bases. Perspectives on Politics, 15(1), 129-136.
Young, K. L. (2021). MULTICAUSALITY AND EQUIFINALITY. Research Methods in the Social Sciences: an AZ of Key Concepts, 8(2), 174.
Zaharna, R. S., Arsenault, A., & Fisher, A. (2013). Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy. Nueva York: Routledge.
Zhou, P., & Zhu, P. (2017). A practical synchronization approach for fractional-order chaotic systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, 89(3), 1719-1726.
