نوع مقاله : مقالات
نویسنده
دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
هدف نوشتار، بررسی ابعاد هویتی و هنجاری تلاش ایران برای پیوستن به باشگاه کشور‌های هسته‌ای است و به این پرسش پاسخ داده است که هویت و دغدغه‌های هویتی در منازعۀ هسته‌ای ایران و حل آن چه جایگاهی دارد. در پاسخ به این پرسش، با استفاده از روش پژوهش تحلیلی و کیفی، این فرضیه به آزمون گذاشته می‌شود که به رسمیت شناخته نشدن دغدغه‌های هویتی ایران توسط غرب در جریان منازعۀ هسته‌ای، در ادامه پیدا کردن این منازعه، اثرگذار بوده است. به همین‌ترتیب، فرونشاندن این دغدغه‌های هویتی در قالب ترتیبات اتخاذشده در قالب برنامه عمل مشترک و سپس برنامه جامع اقدام مشترک، به حل‌وفصل منازعۀ هسته‌ای یاری رسانده است. همچنین نویسنده با استفاده از نظریۀ روانشناسی اجتماعی، دلیل راه یافتن دغدغه‌های هویتی ایران به منازعۀ هسته‌ای را رقابت هویتی میان ایران و غرب می‌داند. به‌این‌ترتیب که رقابت هویتی میان ایران و غرب، مخالفت غرب با تکمیل چرخه سوخت هسته‌ای و غنی‌سازی اورانیوم در داخل ایران را از نظر هویتی برای ایران دارای اهمیت ساخته و آن را به تلاش برای احقاق حقوق هسته‌ای خود، باوجود تحریم‌ها و تهدید‌ها مصمم گردانده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Abrams, E. (2012). Attacking Iran's nuclear project two views. World Affairs, 176(1), 25-38.
Aghaei, S., & Rasooli, A. (2009). Constructivism and the Islamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy towards Israel. Journal of Politics, 39 (1), 1-16 (In Persian).
Bahgat, G. (2006). Nuclear proliferation: the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Studies, 39 (3), 307-327.
Aleahmad, J. (2005). Westoxification. Tehran: Ferdows Publications (In Persian).
Blackstock, J., & Milkoreit, M. (2007, Spring). Understanding the Iranian nuclear equation. Journal of Public and International Affairs, 18, 7-28.
Champion, M. (2015). Bush's Iran plan is worse Than Obama's. Retrieved in 2015, June 22 from: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-04-28/bush-s-iran-plan-is-worse-than-obama-s.
Coleman, P., & Lowe, K. (2007). Conflict, identity, and resilience: negotiating collective identities within the Israeli and Palestinian diasporas. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(4), 377-412.
Daneshpajooh, M. (2002, Winter). Iranian culture and its impact over the global culture. Journal of Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences of the University of Tehran, 67-78 (In Persian).
Dehghani, M.; Atran, S.; Iliev, R.; Sachdeva, S.; Medin, D., & Ginges, J. (2010). Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(7), 540–546.
Dehghani Froozabadi, S. (2011). The Islamic theory of foreign policy: a framework for analysis of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 3(1), 7-47 (In Persian).
Doyle, T. (2015). Iranian nuclear controversy is also about saving face, in Iran and the nuclear deal. Retrieved in 2015, June 20 from: http://pomeps.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/POMEPS_Studies_13_Iran_Web.pdf.
Emamjomehzadeh, S., & Hameganmorad, N. (2013). Preservation of the Iranian – Islamic identity in the global level based on the theory of constructivism. Studies of Islamic Revolution, 9(34), 29-48 (In Persian).
Fallahi, S. (2007). Acomperative study of the nuclear diplomacy of Seyyed Mohammad Khatami and Mahmood Ahmadinejad (Until 1747 resolution), Political Sciences Research Letter, 6(1), 53-86 (In Persian).
Frey, K. (2006). Nuclear weapons as symbols: the role of norms in nuclear policy making. Retrieved in 2015, June 15 from:
http://www.ibei.org/images/stories/papers/WP_IBEI_3.pdf.
Gartzke, E., & Gleditsch, K. (2006). Identity and conflict: ties that bind and differences that divide. European Journal of International Relations, 12 (1), 53-87.
Ghahremanpoor, R. (2004). A constructivist analysis of the islamic republic of iran’s foreign policy. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 7 (1), 71-88 (In Persian).
Ghavam, A., & Javdani Moghadam, M. (2007). A constructivist Study of the principles of the Islamic Republic’s foreign policy. First Line Quarterly, 1(3), 91-104 (In Persian).
Gries, H. P. (2005). Social psychology and the identity-conflict debate: is a ‘china threat’ inevitable? European Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 235–265.
Iran Daily. (2015). Obama: Iranians never compromise their national pride. Retrieved in 2015, June 23 from:
http://www.iran-daily.com/News/115043.html.
Joint Plan of Action. (2014). Retrieved in 2015, March 10 from:
http://eeas.europa.eu/statements/docs/2013/131124_03_en.pdf.
Karami, L. (2004). The identity of the stae and foreign policy. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 18 (1), 1-37 (In Persian).
Kelman, H. C. (1995). Contributions of an unofficial conflict resolution effort to the Israeli–Palestinian breakthrough. Negotiation Journal 11(1), 19–27.
Kutchesfahani, S. (2006). Iran’s nuclear challenge and European diplomacy, European Security and Global Governance. Retrieved in 2015, Jun 27 from: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/89544050_IranIP.pdf.
Lindsay, J., & Takeyh, R. (2010). After Iran gets the bomb: containment and its complications. Foreign Affairs, 89(2), 33-49.
Mohammadnia, M. (2014). The holistic constructivism: a comprehensive approach to explanation of Iran’s foreign policy behaviours. Jostarhae Siasi Moaser, 5(1), 135–158 (In Persian).
Moshirzadeh, H. (2007). Discursive foundations of Iran's nuclear policy. Security Dialogue, 38(4), 521–543.
Mottaghi, A., & Kazemi, H. (2007). Constructivism, identity, language and Islamic Republic of Iran’s foreign policy. Quarterly of Politics, 37(4), 209-237 (In Persian).
Parsadoost, M. (2007). Hospitality and rehigious tolerance of Iranians in the Shah-Abbas’s era. Bokhara Journal, 11(3), 158-171 (In Persian).
Parseed. (2003). Tehran nuclear declaration 2003. Retrieved in 2015, June 20 from: http://parseed.ir/?ez=8705.
Pillar, P. (2012). We can live with a nuclear Iran. Retrieved in 2015, August 13 from: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/marchapril_2012/features/we_can_live_with_a_nuclear_ira035772.php?page=all.
Rodgers, J. (2015). Enriching history: Bush to Obama on Iran's enrichment, Retrieved in 2015, June 22 from:
https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/ArmsControlNow/2015-04-09/Enriching-History-Bush-to-Obama-on-Irans-Enrichment.
Rothman, J., & Olson, M. (2001). From interests to identities: towards a new emphasis in interactive conflict resolution. Journal of Peace Research, 38(3), 289-305.
Sadeghi, S. (2009). An intrioduction to study of xenophobia in the contemporary Iranian political culture. Political Sciences Research Letter, 4(4) 147-174 (In Persian).
Saniabadi, E. (2012). Exploring the Islamic Republic of Iran’s identity from a constructivist perspective. Political Sciences, 15(58), 177-200 (In Persian).
Sebenius, J. K., & Singh, M. (2011). Is a nuclear deal with Iran possible? Retrieved in 2015, August 13 from:
http://www.pon.harvard.edu/wp-content/ uploads/images/posts/ IranWP_ Final_ Belfer FormSebeniusSingh.pdf.
Seul, J. (1999). Ours is the way of God: religion, identity, and intergroup conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 36(5), 553–569.
Seyednejad. S. (2010). The comparative and analythical study of islamic republic of iran’s foreign policy. Political Sciences, 13(49) 20-38 (In Persian).
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–331.
United Nations Security Council Press Release. (2010). Security Council imposes additional sanctions on Iran, voting 12 in favor to 2 against, with 1 abstention. Retrieved in 2015, February 15 from:
http://www.un.org/press/en/2010/sc9948.doc.htm.
United Nations Security Council Press Release. (2008a). Security Council tightens restrictions on Iran’s proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities, increase vigilance over Iranian banks, has states inspect cargo. Retrieved in 2015, February 15 from: http://www.un.org/press/en/2008/sc9268.doc.htm.
United Nations Security Council Press Release. (2008b). Security Council reaffirms earlier resolutions on Iran’s uranium enrichment, calls on country to comply with obligations, fully and without delay. Retrieved in 2015, February 15 from: http://www.un.org/press/en/2008/sc9459.doc.htm.
United Nations Security Council Press Release. (2007). Security Council toughest sanctions against Iran, adds arms embargo, with unanimous adaption of sanction 1747. Retrieved in 2015, February 15 from:
http://www.un.org/press/en/2007/sc8980.doc.htm.
Vaez, A., & Sadjadpour, K. (2013). Iran’s nuclear odyssey: costs and risks, Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/2013/04/02/iran-s-nuclear-odyssey-costs-and-risks/fvui. (accessed on 2015, August 13).
Walt, S. (2012). The mother of all worst-case assumptions about Iran. Retrieved in 2015, August 13 from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/11/30/the-mother-of-all-worst-case-assumptions-about-iran.
Waltz, K. (2012). Why Iran should get the bomb. Foreign Affairs, 91(4), 2-5.
Wright, N., & Sadjadpor, K. (2014). What neuroscience can teach us about making a deal with Iran. Retrieved in 2015, June 21 from:
http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/01/14/what-neuroscience-can-teach-us-about-making-deal-with-iran/gyec.
Zarifian Yeganeh, M. (2007). The Islamic fundamentalism stigma. Farhang-e-Pooya, 7, 76-77 (In Persian).
)
ارسال نظر در مورد این مقاله