Methods for Settling Disputes between Iran and the United States Arising from Judgments issued by both Countries' Domestic Courts under their Immunity Laws

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• Azam Amini ¹
• Alireza Ebrahimgol ²

¹ Shahid Beheshti University

² Farabi University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jipr.v5i1.51174

Abstract

The Islamic Republic of Iran's law for jurisdiction of Iranian judiciary for proceeding with the civil suits made against foreign states was adopted in response to the judgments made by the US courts against the state government of the Islamic Republic of Iran and its related organizations and breach of their immunity. However, irrespective of the validity of those decisions, now there are many various decisions, valid and enforceable under each state domestic law, issued by the court of each state against the other state. Under the US laws and regulations, resolving disputes arising from those decisions is the legal precondition for normalization of the relations between the both states. The 1955 Iran-US Amity Treaty will provide the national and international legal basis for such a settlement through resorting to the international court of justice and other means of friendly dispute settlement including arbitration. Historically, there are different ways for this resolution such as concluding lump sum agreements, establishment of foreign claim settlement commission, and international mass claim procedure (IMCP). All these methods have their specific virtues but it seems that the IMCP method is a more suitable way for settling disputes arising from decisions issued under those immunity Acts.

Keywords

• Ammity treaty
• International court of justice
• Lump sum agreement
• Foreign claim settlement commission
• International mass claim procedure

References

References

Abaclat and Others (n 1) and The Argentine Republic (n 6)

Abdollahi, M., & Mirshahbiz, S. (2003). State Immunity in International Law, Vice president of research, law and regulations. (in Persian)

Amini, A., & Abak, S. (2015). Study of the optimal deterrence and the gain elimination theories on punitive damages in tort cases (emphasizing on the United States Jurisprudence), Encyclopedia of Economic Rights, 21(6). (in persian).

Case law

Christise, G. C. (1991). Current Trends in the American Law of Punitive Damages, Anglo-American Law Review.

Claim No.LIB-I-OO1, LIB-I-002, http://www.justice.gov/fcsc/claim-numbers-lib-i-001-through-lib-i-052.

Claims Settlement Agreement between the United States of America and Iraq Signed at Baghdad September 2, 2010

Claims Settlement Agreement between the United States of America and the Great Socialist people's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 2008

David, P. S. (2013). The foreign sovereign immunities act: a guide for judges, federal judicial center.

Department of Sates, Oversea Citizen Services, office of policy Review of Interagency liaison.

Edward, Re. D. (1961-1962). The foreign Claims Settlement Commission and International Claims, Syracuse law Review, 516.

Edward, Re. D. (1961-1962). The Foreign Claims Settlement commission: its Functions and Jurisdiction, Mich. L. Rev, 1079.

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission Of The United States United States Department Of Justice Washington, Dc 20579, Claim No. LIB-I-006, Decision No. LIB-I-013

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of The United States United States Department Of Justice Washington, Dc 20579, Claim No. LIB-I-OOI, Decision No. LIB-I-OOI.

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission Of The United States United States Department Of Justice Washington, D.C. 20579, Claim No. IRQ-I-003, Decision No. IRQ-I-006.

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States, U.S. Department Of Justice 2013 Annual Report, Including the Final Report on the First and Second Libya Claims Programs, 2013 FCSC Ann

G.A, 6th Committee, 18th session, 27 Oct.2000

Holtzmann, M. (2007). International Mass Claims Process: Legal and Practice Perspectives, Howard, Kristjansdottir Edda (Eds), Oxford University Press, published.

http://www.justice.gov/fcsc/final-opinions-and-orders-5.

Jurisdictional Immunity of the State, Germany v. Italy, ICJ.

Lillich, B. R. (1962). International Claims: their Adjudication by National Commissions, Syracuse University Press.

Lillich, B. R. (1962). International claims: their settlement by lump sum agreements, Syracuse university press.

Lillich, B. R. (1985). Encyclopedia Public International Law, North-Holland-Amsterdam. New York, Oxford.

Lillich, B. R., & Weston H. B. (1982). International Claims: Contemporary European Practice, University press Virginia.

Report of the International Law Commission, 2001, Art 4&8

Rosenfeld, F. (2013). Mass Claims in International Law, Jornal of International Dispute Settlement, 4(1).

Stewart, D. P. (2013). The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. A guide for Judges, Federal Judicial Center.

Surrey (1951). Problems of the Italian Peace Treaty: Analysis of Claims Provisions and Description of Enforcement, Law &Contemporary Problems, 16.

The Housing Property Claims Commission in Kosovo (HPCC) Resolution No 7, 11 April 2003.

United States Department of state Washington, D. C. 20520, November 27, 2013. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/pages/attachments/2014/06/20/libya_claims_referral_letter_11-27-2013.pdf

Yearbook International Law Commission, 2001, Commentary of Art, 37.