A Comparative Study on the Nationalization of the Oil Industry and the Iranian Nuclear Issue from the Perspective of International Order

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• sirous Mohebi ¹
• saeede Ahmadi ²

¹ Azad university of Kermanshah

² shahid beheshti university

https://doi.org/10.22067/jipr.v4i1.47833

Abstract

This confrontation of the West and especially America with Iran, has similarities with England´s confrontation with this country in nationalization of oil. This research seeks to compare similarities and differences of these two events together And with investigating the global situation of the main players in each event, analyze the effect and impact of these events on the global system and finally, with checking all of points, Answer this question that In the event similarity of the process of solving these issues together, can expect the same results, or close together or not. In this study, will be analyzed the situation of the nuclear issue on the basis of the results of the nationalization of oil, with Comparative - analytical method and based on Wallerstain word system theory and concept of hegemony cadence, term of nuclear matter, based on the result of nationalization oil industry and have explained the sharing points and we have concluded that this two events have been similar. Aspect some word terms, indwelling the actors in system, hegemon approach to the issue and the type of impact on the system approach and the parties involved in the events have commonalities is that the problem affected.

Keywords

• Nationalization of oil
• Nuclear issue
• Global system
• America
• England
• Iran

References

Abrahamian, E. (2013). The coup: 1953, the CIA, and the roots of modern U.S.-Iranian relations, (M. E. Fattahi, Trans.). Tehran: Ney publishing. (in Persian)

Ahmadian, G., & Ahmadi, S. A. (2014). Iran’s nuclear conflict: institutional liberalism versus neo-realism, Iranian political science Association, 9(3), 37-74. (in Persian)

Ahmadinejad, M. (2010). An interview with The New Yorker, 10 August. (in Persian) Available at: http://www.president.ir/fa/23292.

Ashraf, A. (1993). Conspiracy Theories, Encyclopedia Iranica, 6(2), 138-147.

Attlee, C. (1951). (Document) British Embassy. Letter to the British Ambassador in Washington, Folder 371/ Relatod to Persia 1951/ Number 34-91541.

Axford, B. (2004). The Global System: Economics, Politics and Culture, (H. Moshirzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Political and International Studies Office. (in Persian)

Biden, J. (2012). Remarks by the vice president to the rabbinical assembly leadership, White House, May 8. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/08/remarks-vice-president-rabbinical-assembly-eadership

Bigdeli, A. (2003). The Lack of strategy and failure of Mossadeq. History of Foreign Relations. 4(15), 31-71. (in Persian)

Bill. J. (1992). The eagle and the lion, (M. Gholami, Trans.). (in Persian)

British Embassy, (1951). Telegram to the Foreign Secretary on the Persian Situation, Folder 248/Related to Persia/Number 1951/34-1514.

Dadkhah, K. (2012). Mossadeq reforms, myth or reality. Andishe Pouya Review, 1(6), 107-113. (in Persian)

De Bellaigue, C. (2012). The politics of dignity: why nuclear negotiations with Iran keep failing, may 23. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/ archive/2012/05/the-politics-of-dignity-why-nuclear-negotiations-with-iran-keep-failing/257547/

De Bellaigue, C. (2014). Patriot of Persia: Muhammad Mossadegh and a Tragic Anglo-American Coup. (H. Homayoonpoor, Trans.). Tehran: Kandokav Publishing. (in Persian)

Einhorn, R. (2013). Getting to yes with Iran”, Foreign Policy, July 10. Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/10/getting-to-yes-with-iran/Foreign Office Papers, (1951). Memo of Conversations, February 14, Fo 371/Persia 1951/ 98608.

Ghahremanpour, R. (2008). Approach of the great powers to Iran's nuclear issue, Tehran: Eslamic Azad University publisher, (in Persian)

Goode, J. F. (2003). The United States and Iran: in the shadow of Musaddiq, (M. Haghighatkhah, Trans.). Tehran: Ghoghnoos publishing. (in Persian)

Hammond, J. (2011). Iran is singled out because it defies Washington, Foreign Policy, Interview, and Retrieved in 14 September 2013 from: http://www. foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/07/06/iran-is-singled-out-because-it-defies-washington/m.

Khaloozadeh, S. (2012). Europe Union sanctions diplomacy against Iran's nuclear program. Iranian Journal of International Politics. 1(1), 50-67. (in Persian)

Maloney, S. (2013). In crafting a nuclear deal with Iran, Mossadegh still matters, Brooking Center, August 19. Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/ iran-at-saban/posts/2013/08/19-iran-mossadegh-sanctions-nuclear.

Ministry of Fuel and Power, Report of Situation of Iranʼs Oil, (1951 September 5-6), Folder 371/Related to Persia 1951/ Number 34-91589.

Mirak-Weissbach, M. (2004). Mossadegh reflex in Iranian nuclear policy, Executive Intelligence Review. Retrieved in 20 January 2014 from: http://www. Larouchepub.com/other/2004/3137mossadegh.html.

Mohamadi alamoti, M. (2006). The concept of global community and of the process of globalization, Tehran: High Institute of Education & Research, Management & Planning. (in Persian)

Mottaghi, E. (2000). The impact of economic sanctions imposed by America on the National Security of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Political Science, 3(1). (in Persian) 44-63.

Rajabi, B. (2012). Iranian xenophobia, Andishe Pouya Review, 1(6), 126-132. (in Persian)

Saei, A. (2005). Contemporary currents of thought on development, Tehran: Ghoomes. (in Persian)

Salimi, H. (2007). Various theories about globalization, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)

Shoamanesh, S. S. (2009). Iran's George Washington: remembering and preserving the Legacy of 1953”, MIT International Review. Retrieved in 6 October 2014 from: http://web.mit.edu/mitir/2009/online/mossadegh.htm

Stern, A. (2010). Who won the oil wars? (A. Motazed Rad, Trans.). Kermanshah: Taghbostan publishing. (in Persian)

Tabatabaee, S. A. (2006). Americaʼs Jewish lobby, brokers Iran sanctions. Journal of Foreign Policy, 20(1), 35-83. (in persian)

U.S. National Security Strategy, (2002). The National Security Strategy United States of America, the White House, Washington.

Wallerstein, I. (1991). Geopolitics and Geoculture: Essays on the Changing World-System, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, I. (2002). The Eagle Has Crash Landed, Foreign Policy, July & August. Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/11/the-eagle-has-crash-landed/ #.

Walters, V. A. (1978). Silent Missions, Doubleday & Company, Garden city, NYWorldwide Threat Assessment of the U. S Intelligence Community, (2013), Office of Director of National Intelligence. Available at: http:// www. dni.gov /index. php.