Document Type : مقالات

Authors

1 department of law, Isfahan (Khorsgan) branch, Islamic Azad university, Isfahan, Iran

2 Mahmoud Jalali Kerveh associate professor law department university of Isfahan

3 Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e Kord

Abstract

Usually the relationship between international law and international politics is considered reciprocal relationship that one includes fairness and equality and another one containing the power and it is often assumed that international law reduced by power, because there is no world government to control power and anarchy reduce the administrative options and restricts the effect of international law. Instead, this paper assumes that the hegemon is the creator, protector and fixing the rules of international law. Powerful states and especially hegemonic governments to reduce the costs associated with the consolidation of international peace and security, have forced to institutionalization and application of legal rules, As international law needs power to impose its rules. This paper aims to examine the role of hegemon on development of international law by historical perspective and descriptive- analytic method.

Keywords

Ajorloo, M., & Etebar, A. (2008). Position of military power in establishing the hegemony of America after the end of the Cold War. Geopolitical Journal, 3, 162-137. (in Persian).
Antoniades, A. (2008). From Theories of Hegemony to Hegemony Analysis, in International Relations. Retrived from: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/2175.
Urgstaller, M. (2005). Theories of Compliance with International Law. Leiden: The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Cali, B. (2009). International Law for International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daheshiar, H. (2002). September 11, the structure of the international system and the hegemony of America. Journal of Strategic Studies, 3, 729-738. (in Persian).
Daheshiar, H. (2006). America and reforms of the United Nations: the hegemony of the Note, International Studies Journal, 4,116-94. (in Persian)
Destradi, S. (2008). Empire, hegemony, and leadership: developing a research framework for the Study of Regional Powers. Retrived from www.giga-hamburg.de/workingpapers.
Dunoff, J. (2000). International legal scholarship at the millennium. Chicago Journal of International Law. 85, 66-82.
Eikenberry, J. J. (2004). Only Superpower: America's hegemony in the 21st century, A. Fazli Pour. (Tr.). Tehran: Abrar Moaser Institute. (in Persian).
Gaubatz, K. T. (2006). Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations, in: International Law and International Relations. Simmons, B., Steinberg, R. (Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ghanbarloo, A. (2006). Hegemonic stability in security-economic strategy of America, Journal of Strategic Studies.4, 901-933. (in Persian)
Griffiths, M. (2005). Beyond the Bush doctrine: American hegemony and world order. Retrived from: www.griffith.edu.au/dspace/handle/10072/24862.
Hafner-Burton, M.; Victor, D., & Lupu, Y. (2012). Political science research on international law: the state of the field, The American Journal of International Law. 106(47), 47-97.
Haji-Yousefi, O. M., & Alvand, M. (2004). Iran and SCO: hegemony and counter-hegemony. Journal of Political Science. 2,163 -194. (in Persian)
Hinnebusch, R. (2006). The Iraq war and international relations: implications for small states. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19(3), 451-463.
Ipek, P. (2013). Hegemony and crisis in global political economy: the importance of legitimacy. Journal of International Affairs, XVIII (4), 29-45.
Irish, A.; Ku, Ch., & Diehl, P. (2013). Bridging the International law: international relationas divided: taking stock of progress. Georgja Journal of International and Comparative Law, 41(2), 357-388.
Jamshidi, M. (2007). Single power-oriented international systems: unipolar, hegemony, empire. Journal of Strategic Studies. 4, 785-804. (in Persian)
Karami, A. (2006). Hegemony in international politics: a conceptual framework, historical experience and its future. Political Science Research. 3, 1-27. (in Persian)
Khezri, R. (2009). Europe's policy toward America's role in the context of transatlantic relations: liberal hegemonic or imperial. Foreign Policy Journal. 2, 449-474. (in Persian)
Koskenniemi, M. (2004). International law and hegemony: a reconfiguration. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. 17(2), 1-26.
Kratochwil, F. (2000). How do norms matter? In the role of law in international politics: essays in international relations and international law.35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krept, S. E., & Arend, A. C. (2006). Why states follow the rules: toward a positional theory of adherence to international legal regimes. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law. 16, 331-414.
Krisch, N. (2005). International law in times of hegemony: unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order. The European Journal of International Law. 16(3), 369-408.
Kwakwa, E. (2003). The international community, international law, and the United States: there in one, two against one, or one the same? In Byers, M. & Nolte, G. (Eds), United States Hegemony and Foundations of International Law. 24-42. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Layne, Ch. (2006). The unipolar illusion revisited. International Security. 31(2), 7-33.
Link Liter, A. (2007). Neorealism, critical theory and Bersazy School. Tayyeb, A. (Tr.). Tehran: Office of Political and International Studies. (in Persian)
Mastandono, M. (2004). Incomplete hegemony and security in the Asia-Pacific incomplete order; the in superpower America's hegemony in the 21st century. Fazli Pour, A. (Tr.), Tehran: Moaser Abrar Cultural Institute of International Studies. (in Persian)
Moshirzadeh, H. (2007). The transformation of the theories of international relations. Tehran: the Samt publications. (in Persian)
Moshirzadeh, H., & Jafari, H. (2011). The hegemonic powers and the revolutionary governments: A Case Study of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Foreign Affairs. 1, 47- 78. (in Persian)
Mousavi, R. (2007). The main sources of threats in the international system: the insecurity World. Diplomatic Hamshahri Monthly Magazine. 2(23), 3-23. (in Persian)
Naghibzadeh, R. (2009). Grand theories of international relations. Tehran: Ghomes publication. (in Persian)
Niakouby, A., & Ghiasi, A. (2013). China empowerment and the USA strategy, instrumental view toward Security Council. World Policy Journal. 3, 63-87. (in Persian)
Norton Moore, J. (2004). United States adherence to the law of the sea convention: a compelling national intrest. Retrivied from: www. virginia.edu/colp/pdf/ armed-services-testimony.pdf
Pourahmadi, H. (2008). The political economy of multilateral hegemony-oriented: conceptual synthesis of liberal hegemony and Gramshin paradigm. Journal of Political Science. 2, 68-37. (in Persian)
Rajagopal, B. (2006). Counter-hegemonic international law: rethinking human rights and development as a third world strategy. Third World Quarterly. 27(5), 767 – 783.
Razavipour, A. (2004). The end of the Cold War and the growing influence of USA in the Middle East. Unpublished Master's thesis. Tehran University: Tehran. (in Persian)
Rezaei, A. (2010). Idea-based order: order pattern of United States America in the post-Cold War international system. Political and International Studies Journal. 3, 196-171. (in Persian)
Speace, K. K. (2005). International organizations. Sharifi Tarazkuhi, H. (Tr.) Tehran: Mizan Publication. (in Persian)
Seyfzadeh, H. (2000). In international relations theory, principles and forms of thought. Tehran: Samt publications. (in Persian)
Simmons, B. A., & Steinberg, R. (2006). International Law and International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Von Glan, G. (2008). An Introduction to Public International Law. Aghayi, D. (Tr.). Tehran: Mizan Publication. (in Persian)
Wallensteen, P. (1992). In the scientific study of peace and war. Vasquez, J. A., & Henehan, M. T. (Eds). Lanham: Lexington Books.
CAPTCHA Image