Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparison of Energy Security in OECD CountriesBased on Composite Indicator

Document Type : مقالات

Authors

• mina mohtashami ¹
• Taghi Ebrahimi Salari ²
• Mohammad Hossein Mahdavi Adeli ³

¹ دانشگاه مازندران

² Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

³ Ferdowsi University

https://doi.org/10.22067/jipr.v4i1.39135

Abstract

This study with examination of the dimensions and indexes of energy security provided a comprehensive composite index for organization economic cooperation and development countries )OECD(. The used dimensions in this study are selected based on the newest definition by Soacool (2011) including "availability of energy", "the technology"," the price of energy", " the environment" and "the government stability". To examining and calculating these dimensions, 182 index for OECD countries is considered. Then countries are ranked based on the seven step methodology which is provided to build the composite index. The results of last Ranking is suggested that the United States has particularly attentive to the different aspects of energy security, so that with policy on this issue has been able to maintain a good difference with other countries of OECD and be first in energy security among this group. Preparation of strategic oil reserves, diversification of energy supply, having state-level high technology and good governance as important factors are known.

Keywords

• energy security
• Composite Index
• OECD

References

References

Azar, A., & Rajab Zadeh, A. (2009). Applied decision (approach MADM). Tehran: Neghah Danesh. (in Persian).

Ebert, U., & Welsch, H. (2004). Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47(2), 270-283.

Franki, V., & Viskovi, A. (2015). Energy security, policy and technology in South East Europe: Presenting and applying an energy security index to Croatia, Journal of Energy, 90(1), 1-14.

Funtowicz, S. O.; Munda, G., & Paruccini, M. (1990). The aggregation of environmental data using multicriteria methods, Journal of Environmetrics, 1(4), 353-36.

Geng JB, Ji. Q. (2013). Multi-perspective analysis of China's energy supply security, Journal of Energy, 64(1), 541-550.

Ghaemi, Asl. M. (2011). Providing a composite index to measure human development based on Islamic Learning and its application in the ranking of the Islamic countries. Unpublished MA dissertation, University of Imam Sadeq (AS), Tehran .(in Persian).

Goldwyn, D. (2011). Triangle arrangement, America, Africa & China, from competition to cooperation (translation by Mohammadi Hossein Abadi, M), Tehran: Institute for International Energy Studies. (in Persian).

Greene, D. L. (2010). Measuring energy security: Can the United States achieve oil independence?, Energy Policy, 38(4), 1614–1621.

Gupta, E. (2008). Oil vulnerability index of oil-importing countries, Journal of Energy Policy, 36(3), 1195–1211.

Jansen, J. C.; Arkel, W. G., & Boots, M. G. (2004). Designing indicators of long term energy supply security. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN), Netherlands.

Kendell, James. M. (1998). Measures of oil import dependence. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Department of Energy (DOE), U. S. A.

Kruyt, B.; Vuuren, V.; De Vries, H., & Groenenberg, H. (2009). Indicators for energy security, Journal of Energy Policy, 37(6), 2166 –2181.

Luft, G., & Korin, A. (2011). Experts' views about energy security, Energy Security Challenges for the 21st Century. (Translate by Pashang, M). Tehran: Institute of International Energy Studies. (in Persian).

Maleki, A. (2007). Energy security and lessons for Iran, Journal of Rahbord Yas, 12(1), 206-222. (in Persian).

Mohtashami, M. (2012). Evaluation and comparison of energy security in OECD and OPEC countries member based on composite indicator. Unpublished MA dissertation, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in Persian).

Nardo, M.; Saisana, M.; Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User’s Guide, European Commission. Ispra: Joint Research Centre (JRC), Italy.

Percebois, J. (2007). Energy Vulnerability and its Management, International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 1(1), 51–62.

Portugal-Pereira, J., & Esteban, M. (2014). Implications of paradigm shift in Japan's electricity security of supply: a multi-dimensional indicator assessment, Appl Energy, 123(15), 424-434.

Ren, J., & Sovacool, K. B. (2014). Quantifying, measuring, and strategizing energy security: determining the most meaningful dimensions and metrics, Journal of Energy, 76(1), 838-849.

Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Italy.

Sovacool, K. B. (2011). Evaluating energy security in the Asia pacific: Towards a more Comprehensive approach, Journal of Energy Policy, 39(11), 7472–7479.

Sovacool, K. B.; Mukherjee, I.; Drupady, M., & D’Agostino, A. (2011). Evaluating energy security performance from 1990 to 2010 for eighteen countries, Journal of Energy, 36(10), 5846-5853.

Vaezi, M., & Monfared, GH. (2013). Energy and energy security as a means to the calculations change policy and international security (case study, strategy of energy security in America and the United Kingdom), Journal of Rahbord, 68(3), 63-84. (in Persian).

Vivoda, V. (2010). Evaluating energy security in the Asia-Pacific region: Anovel Methodological approach, Journal of Energy Policy, 38(9), 5258–5263.

Von Hippel, D.; Savage, T., & Hayes, P. (2009). Introduction to the Asian energy security project: project organization and methodologies, Journal of Energy Policy, 39(11), 6719–6730.