Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 PhD student in Political Science (Political Thought), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad - Iran - Mashhad
Abstract
Abstract
The world empire of Achaemenid Iran is recognized as a hegemonic power in the international system of ancient times. This government had hegemonic coordinates in the classical and modern sense, which required a hegemonic power above all else. The Mazdei hegemony was formed based on the political ideas of Iranshahri and the Iranian world order, which was reflected in the Achaemenid foreign policy strategy. The main question is; How was Iranshahri political thought of the Achaemenid era formed based on the concept of hegemony and hegemonic system in the creation of a new Iranshahri world order in the international arena? The results show that Achaemenid Iran as a hegemonic power at the level of the triple system of the ancient world controlled three important regional systems of the ancient world, i.e. the system of the Indian subcontinent and South Asia, the system of the Middle East and the Near East, and most of the Mediterranean system. In addition to legitimate military and economic measures to maintain its hegemony over the international systems, this government used techniques to control power centers, including the balance of power technique to control centrifugal regional powers. Also, the foundation and focal point of Iran's hegemony is based on the justice and specific ideology of the imperial government. In this era, based on the earthly and cosmic order of the imperial system, the cultural, military, economic and political hegemony of Iranshahri was formed and with a dynamic and advanced economy based on economic and commercial power, it created a powerful and unified monetary system in the ancient world. The research method in this article is based on the comparative method and the data collection method is based on library and reliable internet sources.
Keywords
persian].
Amozgar, J. (1995). Mythological History of Iran. Tehran: Samt [in persian].
Andersen, M. S. (2011). How Empires Emerge? Norwegian: Institute of International
Affairs Press.
Beckman, D. (2017). The Use of Treaties in the Achaemenid Empire. University Of
California press.
BakhturTash, N. (1971). Diplomacy of the Achaemenid State. General Staff of the Army:
Shahanshai Army Press. Tehran [in Persian].
Colburn H. P. (2016). Globalization and the Study of the Achaemenid Persian Empire. The
Routledge Handbook of Archaeology and Globalization Routledge. Available at:
file:///C:/Users/x22/Downloads/Globalization_and_the_study_of_the_Achae.pdf
Dehghani Firouzabadi, S.J. (2017). Principles and Foundations of International Relations
(1). Tehran: Samt press [in persian].
DylamSalehi, B. (2005). From Political Order to Cosmic Order in Iranian Thought. Center
for the Recognition of Islam and Iran. Tehran: baz press [in persian].
Diez, T. (2013). Normative Power as Hegemony. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 194–
210.
Dandamayev, M.A. (1994). History of Civilizations of Central Asia, v. 2: The Development
of Sedentary and Nomadic Civilizations, 700 B.C. to A.D. 250. Unesdoc DIGITAL Library:
book part, available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/
pf0000097856.
Eckstein, A. M. (2005) Persia and the Greeks: Failure of an Empire. The International
History Review, 27(4), 807-812.
Eslami, R & Ahmadvand, S. (2019). Political Thought in Ancient Iran. Tehran: Samt Press
[in Persian].
Eslami, R (2020). Basics of Strategy and Techniques of Iranshahri Foreign Policy. Iranian
Research Journal of International Politics, 8(2), 1-26 [in persian].
Farazmand, A. (1998). Administration of the Persian Achaemenid World-State Empire:
Implications for Modern Public Administration. International Journal of Public
Administration, 21(1), 25–86.
Ferguson, N. (2003). Hegemony or Empire? Foreign Affairs, 82 (5), 154-161.
Fitzsimons, S. (2017). The Leadership Styles of the Persian Kings in Herodotus’ Histories.
a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy
in the Faculty of Humanities, England, Manchester. available at:
https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/files/57431137/FULL_TEXT.PDF.
Finn, J. (2021). Persian Collections: Center and Periphery Atachaemenid Imperial Capitals.
Finnish Oriental Society, 9(2), 154–173.
Jamshidi, M. (2007). Unipolar International Systems: Unipolar, Hegemony, Empire.
Strategic Studies Quarterly, 10(4), 785-804 [in Persian].
Jeandet, T. (2018). Iran’s Comeback to the Mediterranean. Orientxxi. available at:
https://orientxxi.info/magazine/iran-s-comeback-to-the-mediterranean,2786.
Harrison, T. (2014). Herodotus on the Character of Persian Imperialism. in A. F. McKinley
(Ed.). Assessing Biblical and Classical Sources for the Reconstruction of Persian
Influence: History and Culture, available at: https://www.academia.edu/9633063/ Herodotus_on_the_character_of_Persian_imperialism_in_A_Fitzpatrick_McKinley_ed_As
sessing_Biblical_and_Classical_Sources_for_the_Reconstruction_of_Persian_Influence_Hi
story_and_Culture_Harrassowitz_2014_.
Hayland, J. (2018). Iranian Interventions; Achaemenid Empire, Athens and Sparta 450 -
386 BC. (M. Maleki, Trans.): Mohammad Maleki. Tehran: Shafiei Press [in persian].
Heywood, A. (2011). Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan Press.
Halil M.İ. (2020). A Historical Example of Multiculturalism: Achaemenid Empire
Multiculturalism. Journal of Gaziantep university Faculty of Economics and Administrative
Sciences, 2(1), 118-138.
Hoernes, M. (2021). Royal Coinage.in B. Jacobs, R. Rollinger, (Ed), A Companion to the
Achaemenid Persian Empire, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/
9781119071860.ch57.
Ikenberry. G. J &Kupchan, C. A. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International
Organization, 44 (3), 283 – 315.
Ikenberry, G. J & Nexon, D. H. (2019). Hegemony Studies 3.0: The Dynamics of
Hegemonic Orders. Security Studies, available at: DOI: 10.1080/09636412.
2019.1604981.
Gilpin, R. (1981). War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Gilpin, R. (2001). Global Political Economy: understanding The International Economic
Order. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Graham. E, & Newnham, J. (1998). The Penguin Dictionary Ofinternationalrelations.
London: Penguin Boooks press.
Given, L.m (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 1 & 2,
SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kopalyan, N. (2014). After Polarity: World Political Systems, Polar Structural. Transitions,
and Nonpolarity. University of Nevada, Unted state, Las Vegas: UNLV Theses,
Dissertations. Professional Papers, and Capstones. 2277.
Kosari, M. (2017). Comparative Method. in the Book Approach and Method in Political
Science.in A, Manochehri(ed), Approach and Method in Political Science. Tehran: Samt
pess [in Persian].
Lebow, R, & Kelly. R. (2001). Thucydides and Hegemony: Athens and the United States.
Review of International Studies, 27, 593–609.
Layne, C. (2006). The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States'
Unipolar Moment. International Security, 31(2), 7–41.
Levin, D. K, & Modica, S. (2013). Conflict, Evolution, Hegemony and the Power of the
State. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No. 19221,
Cambridge press.
Nexon, D & Wright, T. (2007). What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate. American
Political Science Review, 101 (2), 253-271.
Nexon, D & Neumann, I. B. (2017). Hegemonic-order theory: A field-theoretic account.
European Journal of International Relations. 00(0).1-25. doi:10.1177/1354066117716524.
Overtoom, N. L. (2016). The Power-Transition Crisis of the 240s BCE and the Creation of
the Parthian State, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/
07075332.2016.1140669.
Pham, P (2020). Imperialism’s Legacy in the Study of Contemporary Politics: The Case of Hegemonic Stability Theory. E-International Relations, available at: https://www.e-
ir.info/pdf/85497.
Qadri, H (2011). Paei dar Kouye Iran. Tehran: Alam press [in Persian].
Rosamond, B. (2020). Hegemony: political science. Publisher: Encyclopaedia Britannica,
Inc. available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/hegemony.
RoshanZamir. B, & Ghazanfari, K. (2021). Achaemenid Presence in Ionia: From the End of
the Peloponnese War to the Peace of Antalkidas (404-387 BC). History of Islam and Iran,
139(49), 93-117 [in Persian].
Shahbazi, S. (1971). Iranian Shahanshahan and Tradition. Tehran: Culture and Art press
[in Persian].
Scheidel, W. (2006). Republics between Hegemony and Empire: How Ancient City-States
Built Empires and the USA doesn’t (Anymore). Stanford University Press.
Shahin, N. (2015). In Front of Iran Shahri Political Thought. Available at:
https://ketabkoo.com/book/1317362/%D9%BE%DB%8C%D8%B4-.
Steinfeld, J. M. (2015). The Achaemenid Empire’s Contributions to Public Administration.
International Journal of Public Administration, 38(2), 82–91.
Schmidt, B.C. (2018). Hegemony: A Conceptual and Theoretical Analysis. Dialogue of
Civilizations Research Institute gGmbH Press.
Tuplin, C, (2017). War and Peace in Achaemenid Imperial Ideology. Electrum, 24(31), 54.
Vakili, S. (2011). Dariush Dadger. Tehran: Maharat Pess [in Persian].
Wilkinson, David (1999). Unipolarity Without Hegemony. International Studies
Association. Published by Blackwell Publishers.
Wilkinson, D. (2008). Hêgemonía: Hegemony, Classical and Modern. Journal of World-
Systems Research, XIV (2). 119-141.
Willing, A (2013). Iran and Greece. In J, Curtis and N, Tallis(Ed), The Book of the
Forgotten Empire; Achaemenid Culture, Art and Civilization: Compiler. (K, Behari,
Trans.), Tehran: Press Farzan Rooz [in Persian].
Yun, B. (2021). Persia and Pericles’ Grand Strategy: Was the Peloponnesian War a Bipolar
Hegemonic War? The International History Review, available at:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07075332.2021.1902370
)
Send comment about this article