Document Type : مقالات
Author
Abstract
From the development perspective, the richest countries are the center of the aspirations of politicians, elites, investors, entrepreneurs and etc. Moreover, they are at the center of ordinary people's attention. The wealth linked to culture and geographical location can be the basis for positively projecting international and development ideas to increase the positive reputation of countries and their identity and cultural foundations and make them the center of global attention and attraction. The Scandinavian region is one of the places where the geography of wealth and its development have increased its positive perception. Norway is one of the countries in the region that today has a great attraction and popularity at the international level. Norway's name and branding carry the mental and perceptual processes that make this small country popular and attractive. The main focus of this paper is on the fundamentals of Norway's branding and positive reputation in the international system through cultural diplomacy tools. By describing the important actions and initiatives of Norwegian cultural diplomacy which planned through policymakers in a historical perspective, the paper emphasizes that Norway, despite its significant geopolitical weaknesses and small size, has been able to achieve a positive international branding and positive international reputation in the international system through the positive use of culture. Policy-driven management and the proper use of open and tolerant Norwegian culture, which is part of Nordic culture, has increased Norway's attractiveness and positive perception at the international system.
Keywords
Bendixsen S., Bringslid M., Vike H. (eds) Egalitarianism in Scandinavia. Approaches to
Social Inequality and Difference.pp: 87-108. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ackrén, Maria. (2019). Diplomacy and Paradiplomacy in the North Atlantic and the Arctic:
A Comparative Approach. In: Finger M., Heininen L. (eds) The Global Arctic Handbook.
Springer, Cham, pp: 235-249.
Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: the new brand management for nations, cities and
regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anholt. S. (2010). Places: Identity, Image and Reputation. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Angell, S. (2015). "The Office for Cultural Relations: Representing Norway in the Post-War
Period". In The Office for Cultural Relations: Representing Norway in the Post-War
Period. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff.
Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ausland , J. C. (2019). Norway, Oil, And Foreign Policy, London: Routledge.
Batora, J, (2005). Public Diplomacy in Small and Medium-Sized States: Norway and Canada,
Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael.
Beidollahkhani , A. (2020). Nation branding and national image making: new interdiscipli-
nary perspective for political Science and international relations, “Politics quarterly”, vol.
49, Issue 4, Winter , pp. 999-1020 [In Persian].
https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jpq.2019.224197.1006992.
BeidollahKhani,A., Kahrazeh, Y. (2018). Nordic council: Fundamentals of socialist
developmental regionalism based on perception and global positive image-making.
Journal of Iranian social development studies (JISDS)Vol.10, No. 4 -Autumn. pp: 79-95.
Berge, O.K. (2018). The Art of Foreign Policy: Aesthetics’ Developmental Agency in
Foreign Cultural Policy. In: Hylland O., Bjurström E. (eds) Aesthetics and Politics. New
Directions in Cultural Policy Research.pp:137-164.London: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Berge, O. K. (2017). Look to Norway: Current Norwegian foreign cultural policy, PhD
dissertation in Cultural studies, Kongsberg: University of South-Eastern Norway.
Block, S. (2019). The Humanitarian Superpower Myth: Norwegian shortcomings in response
to the refugee crisis, accessible on November 11, Retrived from:
https://crosssection.gns.wisc.edu/ 2019/11/11/the-humanitarian-superpower-myth-
norwegian-shortcomings-in-response-to-the-refugee-crisis/.
Browning, C. (2015). "Small-State Identities: Promotions Past and Present". In Small-State
Identities: Promotions Past and Present. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff.
Springer.
Buxrud , B. and Fangen, K. (2017). Norwegian national day oratory: constructing and
reconstructing a national we, Nations and Nationalism, 23,( 4) pp:770-789.
Carta,C. and Higgott, R. (2020). Cultural Diplomacy in Europe: Between the Domestic and
the International, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cassinger, C., Merkelsen, H., Eksell, J. et al. (2016). Translating public diplomacy and nation
branding in Scandinavia: An institutional approach to the cartoon crises. Place Branding
Public Diplomacy,(12) pp: 172–186.
Danielsen, H. (2017). A military ERP’? Military assistance and US public diplomacy in
Norway in the early 1950s. Journal of Transatlantic Studies volume 15, pages 313–330.
Eckersley, R. (2015). National identities, international roles, and the legitimation of climate
leadership: Germany and Norway compared, Environmental Politics. Vol. 25(1) pp: 180-
201.
Henrikson, A.K. (2005). Niche Diplomacy in the World Public Arena: the Global ‘Corners’
of Canada and Norway. In: Melissen J. (eds) The New Public Diplomacy. Studies in
Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Kolås, A. (2017). How critical is the event? Multicultural Norway after 22 July 2011, Social
Identities, 23: (5) pp: 518-532.
Leonard, M.; Small, A. (2003). Norwegian Public Diplomacy, The Foreign Policy Centre,
London.
Marcussen, M. (2017). Scandinavian Models of Diplomacy, in Nedergaard Peter and Anders
Wivel (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Scandinavian Politics,pp:240-253. London:
Routledge.
McCallion, M.S. and Brianson, A. (2018). Nordic States and European Integration: Awkward
Partners in the North? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Norad (2018). Norwegian Aid Statistics, Retrived from: https://norad.no/en/front/
toolspublications/ norwegian -aid-statistics/?tab=geo.
Nye, J. (2011). The Future of Power, New York: Public Affairs
Österud ,Ö. (1997). Between Realism and ‘Crusader Diplomacy’: The Norwegian Channel
to Jericho. In: Cooper A.F. (eds) Niche Diplomacy. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave
Macmillan, London.
Østerud, Q. and Selle, P. (2006). Power and Democracy in Norway: The Transformation of
Norwegian Politics, Scandinavian political studies, 29,(1)25-46.
Popa,T,.S. (2015). Norway’s Public and Cultural Diplomacy, Journal of Global Politics and
Current Diplomacy, No 3, Issue 1: 35-49.
Diplomacy. London : Palgrave Macmillan, pp:51-89.
Riste, O. (2004). Norway's foreign relations: a history. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.
Ross, John (2019). The Rise of Little Big Norway, London: Anthem Press.
Saxi,H. L. (2010). Norwegian and Danish Defence Policy: A Comparative Study of the Post-
Cold era, Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Defence Studies.
Sitter N. (2012). The Nordic Countries: The Causes and Consequences of Variable
Geometry. In: Hayward J., Wurzel R. (eds) European Disunion. Palgrave Studies in
European Union Politics. pp 267-282.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sverdrup, U. (2016). Nordic Cooperation and the New Geopolitics, Oslo: Norwegian institute
of international affairs.
Tanil, G. (2012). Europeanization, Integration and Identity: A Social Constructivist Fusion
Perspective on Norway, London: Routledge.
Taulbee J.L., Kelleher A., Grosvenor P.C. (2014a). Norway’s Approach to Achieving Peace:
Structure and Agency. In: Norway’s Peace Policy. Pp:49-73,New York : Palgrave
Macmillan.
Taulbee J.L., Kelleher A., Grosvenor P.C. (2014b). The Peace Engagement of a Peace
Culture: Observations on the National Identity Foundations of Norwegian Foreign Policy.
In: Norway’s Peace Policy. Pp: 23-47, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thorkildsen, L. H. and Kavli , H. (2009). Improving Norway's reputation, Synovate Ltd.
Waage, H, H. (2008). Postscript to Oslo: The Missing Files. Journal of Palestine Studies
38, No. 1: 54–65.
Waage, H, H. (2007). The ‘Minnow’ and the ‘Whale’: Norway and the United States in the
Peace Process in the Middle East, 1993–96. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 34,
No. 2: 157–176.
)
Send comment about this article