Document Type : Original Article
Author
Visiting professor of University of Tehran (Farabi College)
Abstract
In recent years, unilateral act of States has expanded for a variety of reasons. In parallel with this development, international case law and doctrine have increasingly become confronted with the conceptual and practical challenges of these acts. One of these challenges is the base of State’s commitment to their unilateral acts. In this context, the question arises that unlike the bilateral or multilateral acts, which are crystallized in the form of international treaties and in which the commitment of each state is based on the commitment of the other party, in the absence of either party, on what basis is the obligation arising from unilateral act made and with what justification is it recognized as binding. This paper, while examining all the theories presented to response the above questions, shed light on disagreement between the ICJ and the ILC, has tried to adapt these theories to the existing case law and state practices. The findings of this paper confirm that among these multiple theories, the theory of the will of the state is the most defensible theory due to the transcendental position of the state in the structure of international law.
Keywords
obligation”, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law,
pp. 108-113.
Carbone, S. (1975). “Promise in international law: a confirmation of its binding force”,
Italian Year Book International Law, 1, pp. 166-172.
Cedeño, V.R., & Cazorla, M.I. (2019). “Unilateral acts of states in international law”, Max
planck encyclopaedia of public international law, at:
http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-
e1496?prd=EPIL, last seen: 20 May 2019.
Charpentier, J. (1996). “Engagements unilatéraux et engagements conventionnels:
differences et convergences”, Theory of international law at the threshold of the 21st
Century, The Hague: Springer.
D’amato, A. (1992). “Good faith”, Encyclopedia of public international law, Vol. I,
Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.
D’Aspremont, J. (2008). “Softness in international law: a self-serving quest for new legal
materials”, EJIL, 19, (5), pp. 1075-1093.
Eckart, Ch. (2012). Promises of states under international law, Portland: Hart Publishing.
Fauvarque-Cosson, B., & Mazeaud, D. (2008). European contract law: materials for a
common frame of reference: terminology, guiding principles, model rules, Munich:
Sellier & European Law Publishers.
Fiedler, W. (1984). “Unilateral acts in international law”, Encyclopedia of public
international law, Vol. 7, New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Haddadi, M., & Karimi, S. (2018). “Unilateral acts of states as a source of international obligation
in international law”, Legal Research Quarterly, 21, pp. 289-313. (in Persian)
Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy, New York: Oxford University
Press.
Herber, H.L. (2014). The concept of law, Translated by Rasekh, M., Tehran: Nasre Ney. (in
Persian)
Higgins, R. (1994). Problems and process: international law and how we use it, Oxford:
Oxford University press.
Hogg, M. (2017). Obligation: law and language, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jodoin, S. (2008). “International law and alterity: the state and the other”, Leiden Journal of
International Law, 21, pp. 1-28.
Karimi. S. (2020). Legal regime governing on unilateral acts of states in international law,
Tehran, Sherkate-Sahim-Enteshar (in Persian).
Boston: Brill Nijhoff.
Katouzian, N. (2015). Legal acts, Tehran: Sherkate-Sahim-Enteshar (in Persian).
Kolb, R. (2017). Good faith in international law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Koskenniemi, M. (2006). From apology to utopia: the structure of international legal
argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuzmarov, B. (2018). Unilateral acts: a history of a legal doctrine, London: Routledge.
Latta, R. D. (2012). Hans Kelsen and the bindingness of supranational legal norms, Ph.D
Thesis, Georgia State University.
Matthew, L. (2011). “The legitimating role of consent in international law”, Chicago Journal
of International Law, 11, 663, 665.
Mitchell, A.D. (2006). “Good faith in WTO dispute settlement”, Melbourne Journal of
International Law, 7 (2), pp. 1-35.
Ranjbarian, A.H., & Kamalinejad, H. (2014). Teachings of the prominent international
lawyers, Comparative Law Review, 4 (2), pp. 37-56 (in Persian).
Saganek, P. (2015). Unilateral acts of states in public international law, Boston: Brill
Nijhoff.
Schreuer, Ch. (1993). “The waning of the sovereign state: towards a new paradigm of
international law?”, EJIL, 4 (1), pp. 447-471.
Shaw, M. (2008). International law, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sicault, J-D. (1979). “Du caractère obligatoire des engagements unilatéraux en droit
international public”, Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 83, pp. 633-689.
Simpson, G. (2016). “The guises of sovereignty”, Re-envisioning sovereignty: the end of
westphalia?, New York: Routledge.
Skubiszewski, K. (1991). “Unilateral acts of states”, International law: achievements and
prospects, London: Martinus Nijhoff.
Suy E. (1962). Les actes juridiques unilateraux en droit international public, Paris: Librairie
générale de droit et de jurisprudence.
Venturini, G. (1964). “La Portée et les Effets Juridiques des Attitudes et des Actes
Uniláteraux des États”, Recueil des Cours, 112, pp. 363-467.
Ziegler, A., & Baumgartner, J. (2015). “Good faith as a general principle of (international)
law”, good faith in international economic law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeitler, H. (2005). “Good faith in the WTO jurisprudence necessary balancing element or an
open door to judicial activism?”, Journal of International Economic Law, 22 (2), pp. 721-
758.
)
Send comment about this article