Document Type : مقالات

Authors

1 Tehran

2 Alammeh Tabatabaie

Abstract

The theory of national role conception can be considered as an effective theoretical framework for explaining foreign policy of countries. Analysts in foreign policy assessment of countries have consistently sacrificed theoretical insights of domestic or international domains, with respect to one of them. The dynamics in the domestic, regional and international environment are the most powerful drivers in guiding of foreign policy of the countries, for this reason, in this paper; we use the theory of national role conception and attempt to integrate the determinative elements of Turkish foreign policy from 2002 to 2016 into a more systematic framework. The question of this study is despite the rule of the AKP during this period in Turkish political system, what factors contributed to the development of Turkish foreign policy from 2002 to 2016? The hypothesis that has been tested in this article is that domestic, regional and international dynamics have been the most important drivers of Turkish foreign policy, which have been studied in the framework of the theory of national role conception. The findings of this study indicate that the theory of national role conception can be a more useful framework for evaluating Turkish foreign policy in comparison with other theoretical frameworks.

Keywords

References
Adigbuo, R. (2007). Beyond IR Theories: The Case for National Role Conceptions, South African Journal of Political Studies, 34(1), 83-97.
Aras, B. (2009). Davutoglu Era in Turkish Foreign Policy, Seta Policy Brief, 11(32) 127-142.
Bakir, C., & Ziya, O. (2007). The Regulatory State and Turkish Banking Reforms, Development and Change, 41(1), 77–106.
Barnett, M. (1998). Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order, New York: Columbia University Press.
Benli, M., & Altunisik, L. G. M. (2011). Policy in the Middle East under AKP, Turkish Studies, 12(4), 569 – 587.
Bermeo, N. (1992). Democracy and the lessons of dictatorship, Comparative Politics, 24(5), 273-291.
Biddle, J. B. (1986). Recent Developments in Role Theory, Center for Research in Social Behavior, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia.
Bilgehan, B., ozpek., & Yelda, D. (2014). Turkish foreign policy after the ‘Arab Spring’: from agenda-setter state to agenda-entrepreneur state, Israel Affairs, 20(3), 328-346.
Bilgin, A. (2014). Turkish Foreign Policy in a Changing Arab World: Rise and Fall of a Regional Actor, tandfonline, Available at: http://www.tandfonline. com/doi/full/10.1080/07036337.2014.975991?scroll=top&needAccess=true.
Boland Vincent (2004). Eastern premise. Financial Times, Available at:http://www .ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/24ffa904-5e41-11dd-b354-000077b07658.html#axzz2jIb9ti 8 G.
Breuning, Marijke (2017). Role Theory in Foreign Policy, Online Publication, http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-334.
Buzan, B., & Ole, W. (2004). Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Cambridge University Press.
Cakir, R., & Fehmi, C. (2001). Recep Tayyip Erdogan: Bir Donusum Hikayesi [Recep Tayyip Erdogan: A story of transformation]. Istanbul, Turkey: Metis.
Çarkoğlu, A. (2002). The Rise of the New Generation Pro-Islamists in Turkey: The Justice and Development Party Phenomenon in the November 2002 Elections in Turkey, South European Society and Politics, 7(3), 123-156.
Davutoglu, A. (2008). Turkey's New Foreign Policy Vision, Insight Turkey, 10(1), 77-96.
Davutoglu, A. (2008). Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007, Insight Turkey, 10)1), 77-96.
Demir, I. (2017). Turkey’s Foreign Policy toward the Middle East: Under the Shadow of the Arab Spring, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Demir, O.; Mustafa, A., & Metin T. (2004). Anatolian tigers and Islamic capital: Prospect and Challenges, Middle Eastern Studies, 40(6), 166-188.
Gül, A. (2009). Turkish Foreign Policy in the New Era, Lecture at USAK, 16December. Joint Political Declaration on the Establishment of the High Level Cooperation Council among Turkey, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. Retrieved from.
Gumusc, S. (2010). Class, Status, and Party: The Changing Face of Political Islam in Turkey and Egypt, Comparative Political Studies 43(7), 835-861.
Halsti, K. J. (1388). International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, Translators, Bahram Mostaghimi & Massod Tarem Sari, Tehran: Foreign Affairs Ministry Publication (in Persian).
Hermanns, H. (2013). National Role Conceptions in the ‘Global Korea’ Foreign Policy Strategy, Gyeongsang National University.
Holsti, K. j. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy, International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233-309.
Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Hymans E. C. J. (2006). The Psychology of Nuclear Proliferation Identity, Emotions and Foreign Policy, University of Southern California.
Keyman, F. (2009). Turkish Foreign Policy in the Era of Global Turmoil, SETA Policy.
Kirişc, K. (2013). The Rise and Fall of Turkey as a Model for the Arab World, Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/the-rise-and-fall-of-turkey-as-a-model-for-the-arab-world/.
Kirisci, K. (2011). Turkey’s “Demonstrative Effect” and the Transformation of the Middle East, Insight Turkey, 13(2), 33-55.
Kozebalan, H. (2014). Turkey Foreign Policy, Translator, Gholamreza Karimi, Tehran: Chapakhsh Publication. (in Persian)
Kupchan, C. (1994). The Vulnerability of Empire, Cornell University Press.
Laçine, S. (2009). Turgut Özal Period in Turkish Foreign Policy: Özalism, Available at: www. turkishweekly.net/article/333/turgut-ozal-period-in-turkish-foreign-policy-ozalism.htm.
Margaret, H., & Sprout. (1956). Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics, Princeton: Center of International Studies.
McGowan, P. J., & Howard, S. (1973). the Comparative Study of Foreign Policy, Beverly Hills, Calif, SAGE Publishers.
Oniş, Z., & Suhnaz Y. (2009). Between Europeanization and Euro‐Asianism: Foreign Policy Activism in Turkey during the AKP Era, Turkish Studies, 10(1), 7-24.
Onis, Z. (2011). Multiple Faces of the “New” Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique, Insight Turkey 13(1) 47-65.
Özpek, B. B., & Yelda, D. (2012). Foreign Policy: What if the Bowstring is Broken? Iran and the Caucasus 16(1), 117-128.
Sekhri, S. (2009). The role approach as a theoretical framework for the analysis of foreign policy in third world countries, African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(10), 423-432.
Sheldon S. (1987). The Vitalization of Symbolic Interactionism, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(1), 83-94.
Taspinar, O. (2008). Turkey’s Middle East Policies: Between Neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Available at: http://carnegieendowment.org/2008/10/07/turkey-s-middle-east-policies-between-neo-ottomanism-and-kemalism-pub-22209.
Valerie, M. H., & Christopher S. V. (1995). Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, Mershon International Studies Review, 39(2), 209-238.
Varol, O. O. (2013). The Turkish “model” of civil–military relations, oxford University Press and New York University School of Law, 11( 3), 727–750.
Walker, S. G. (1987). Role Theory and Foreign Policy Analysis, Cameron G. Thies Associate Professor University of Iowa Department, https://www.researchgate. net/publication/228985348_Role_Theory_and_Foreign_Policy.
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley Publisher.
Wish, N. B. (1980). Foreign Policy Makers and Their National Role Conceptions, International Studies Quarterly, 24(4), 532-554.
Yavuz, H. (2011). Islam, Secularism and Islamic Democracy in Turkey, Translator, Ahmad Azizi, Tehran: Ney Publication. (in Persian)
CAPTCHA Image