Document Type : مقالات
Authors
Abstract
Geopolitical imagination, by definition, is the competition between powers in forming individuals’, institutions’ and political factors’ perception of the characteristics and contents of geographical space, on the basis of their intended interests. In this article, as a case study, the US perception of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics during the Cold War era is analysed. The authors argue that the image of an evil Soviet during the Cold War was formed through a complicated interaction process among formal geopolitics, applied geopolitics, and general geopolitics. It was through policies, doctrines, political statements including the Truman Doctrine, George Kennan’s Containment Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, National Security Council Report 68 (NSC-68), and Reagan’s Evil Empire Doctrine that the practical geopolitics of the United States provided an evil image of the Soviet Union as an inherently irreconcilable enemy. In this process, the formal geopolitics added a scientific dimension to US representation of the Soviet by presenting geopolitical theories like Heartland, Rimland, Domino, Chain Network, Seversky’s Air Power and the like. Finally, general geopolitics presented the geopolitical discourse of the Soviet Union as an evil enemy, convincing the public opinion by using media representations. Creating such a perception of the Union of Soviet Republics empowered the United States, in such a way that the latter set the ground for its geopolitical interventions in different regions of the world, while at the same time creating identity for its people during four decades of the Cold War.
Keywords
London: Routledge.
Ahmadypour, zahra et al. (2010). Representing imaginary enemy: a geopolitical
discourse. Geopolitics Quarterly, 6(4), 7-41.
Boggs, C & Pollard, T. (2006). Hollywood and the spectacle of terrorism. New
Political Science, 28(3), 335-351.
Carter A. S. and McCormack P. D. (2006). Film, geopolitics and the affective
logics of intervention. Political Geography, 25, 228-245.
Cohen, S. B. (2009). Geopolitics; The Geography of International Relation. New
York: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher, Inc.
Dalby, S. & O’Tuathail, G. (1998). Rethinking geopolitics. New York & London:
Routledge.
Flint, C. (2006). Introduction to Geopolitics. London: Routledge.
Fotiadis, P. (2009). The Strange Power of Maps: How maps work politically and
influence our understanding of the world. School of Sociology, Politics and
International Studies. University of Bristol, Working Paper No. 06-09.
Hall, S. (2003). The Work of representation. In Stuart Hall (ed.), Representation:
Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices.
Hogan, M. J. (1992). The end of the cold war: its meaning and implications.
Cambridge: Chicago University Press.
Jones, M. et al. (2004). An Introduction to Political Geography: Space, Place and
Politics. London: Routledge.
Jones H. S. and Clarke B. D. (2006). Waging terror: the geopolitics of the real.
Political Geography. 25, 298-314.
Mawdsley, E. (2008). Fu Manchu versus Dr Livingstone in the Dark Continent?
Representing China, Africa and the West in British broadsheet newspapers.
Department of Geography. Cambridge University.
Roberson, J. O. (1982). American Myth; American Reality. New York: Hill and
Wang.
Saeed, A. (2007). Media, Racism and Islam phobia: The Representation of Islam
and Muslims in the Media, Sociology Compass. Blackwell Publishing.
Wark, M. (1994). Virtual geography: living with Global Media Events.
Bloomigton: Indian University Press
)
Send comment about this article