Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Political Science, Iran's affairs, at Imam Khomeini International University

2 Associate Professor in department of political science, Imam Khomeini International University (Corresponding Author: zibaei@soc.ikiu.ac.ir)

3 Professor in department of political science, Imam Khomeini International University

4 Associate Professor in department of political science, Imam Khomeini International University

Abstract

Foreign policy as a field of study of international relations is usually analyzed from this point of view. However, with the entry of historical sociology into international relations and the multifactoring of events, analytics that considered the state as a general and integrated actor whose behavior is determined by systemic elements were doubted, because these theories did not explain the historical and complex trends that states act/react at the system. Historical sociology taking into account the changes and transformations in temporal, the impact/impression of trends on each other and with a comparative approach between states and societies has tried to detect the causes and being of phenomena at the level of the system, in addition, to Search articulation and interact between levels. In this sense, while considering the state as one of the main actors, it affects the analysis of its relations with society. Also, the historical sociology of foreign policy studies the causal narration of events with emphasis on history (analytical history, not traditional and narrative analysis), explaining the phenomena in a chain that has affected each other in the course of history and has impacted. In addition, this approach attention to the “transboundary” encounters that have generated and shaped theorizing. “Transboundary” (which is synonymous with "international"), means the histories that interconnect people across borders, whether those borders represent groups, States, and territories, empires or other entities. These Theories are not forged by individuals living within distinct and discrete "local" environments. Rather, the theory is forged through ongoing encounters between "here" and "there, "home" and "abroad," the "domestic" and the "foreign." Both social and political theories have international origins.

Keywords

Acemoglu, D. & Robinson A. J. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press
Anievas, A., and Gogu, C. (2021), Capitalism and ‘the International’: A historical approach. In de Carvalho, B., Costa Lopez, J., & Leira, H., eds. Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2013), The Global transformation: The nineteenth century and the making of modern international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 57, 620–634
Bhambra K. G. (2016), Comparative historical sociology and the state: problems of method. Cultural Sociology, 10 (3), 335– 351 DOI: 10.1177/1749975516639085
Barkawi, T. & Lawson, G. (2017), The International origins of social and political theory. Political Power and Social Theory, Volume 32, pp. 1-7 DOI: 10.1108/S0198-871920170000032001
Bilgenoglu, A. & Menguaslan, H. (2020), A Historical sociology perspective on the legacy of state formation and dynamics of arab revolts in Libya: from elusive authority of Qadhafi to Masses Craving for democracy. Turkish journal of middle eastern studies, 7 (1), 203-234 DOI: 10.26513/tocd.654039
Bayly, M. (2021), Imperialism: Beyond the re-turn to empire in international relations. In de Carvalho, B., Costa Lopez, J., & Leira, H., eds. Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge.
Çapan Z. G.؛  dos Reis, F. & Grasten, M. (2021), Global histories: connections and circulations in historical international relations. In de Carvalho, B., Costa Lopez, J., & Leira, H., eds. Routledge handbook of historical international relations. Abingdon: Routledge
Held. D. (1989). Political theory and the modern state: essays on state, power, and democracy. A Stanford university press classic.
Hobson, J.؛ Lawson, G. & Rosenberg, J. (2010), Historical sociology, published in Denemark, Robert A. (eds.) The international studies encyclopaedia, Wiley-Blackwell; international studies association, UK
Griffin J. L. (2007), Historical sociology, narrative and event structure analysis: fifteen years later, Sociologica, 3, 1-18 DOI:10.2383/25956
Griffiths. M. (2007). International relations theory for the twenty-first century. Routledge
Go, J.؛ Lawson, G. & de Carvalho, B. (2021), Historical sociology in international relations: The challenge of the global, In de Carvalho, B., Costa Lopez, J., & Leira, H., eds. Historical international relations. Abingdon: Routledge
Kafi, M. (2014). Historical sociology: principles, concepts and theories. Research institute of hawzah and university (RIHU). (In Persian)   
Lemon M. C. (1995), The Discipline of history and the history of thought. Routledge
Lawson, G. (2018), International relations as a historical social science. In: Gofas, Andreas and Hamati-Ataya, Inanna and Onuf, Nick, (eds.) The SAGE handbook of the history, philosophy and sociology of international relations
Migdal, S. J. (1988), Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations  and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton university press
Mann, M. (2012), The sources of social power: A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760. Volume 1, Cambridge University Press
Migdal, J. (2012). State in society: studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge university press
Monavari, S. A. (2016). History of the other in Iran`s foreign relations: from the emergence if the safavid (1502 A.D.) the first decade of the founding of the islamic republic regime (1989 A.D.). Kharazmi university. (In Persian)  
Mohammadian, M. (2018). Explaining the pattern of Iranian repeating behaviors in the foreign policy of contemporary history. Ph.D. Dissertation, shahid beheshti university. (In Persian)  
Najafzadeh, M. (2008). Reviewing power relationship in Iran: weak state and strong society, Quarterly political and international approaches, 1(13), 75-95. (In Persian)
Smith, D. (1992). The Rise of historical sociology, polity press
Weiss, L. (2006), Infrastructural power, economic transformation, and globalization, in an anatomy of power the social theory of Michael Mann, by John A. Hall & Ralph Schroeder. cambridge university press
Waldner, D. (1999), State building and late development. cornell university press
Wang, Y. (2021), State-in-Society 2.0: toward fourth-generation theories of the state. comparative politics, 54(1), 175-198 DOI:10.5129/001041521X16184035797221
Zibaei, M.؛ Simbar, R. & Jansiz, A. (2019). Historical sociology of international relations (HSIR) A Theoretical framework of international system analysis, 6 (2), 83-108. (In Persian) doi.org/10.22067/jipr.v6i2.64992   
Zabihi, R. (2021). Sociology of Iran's foreign policy in the framework of nuclear program and diplomacy, Publications of the ministry of foreign affairs. (In Persian)
Zolfaghari, V. (2021). Theoretical analysis of military forces’ behavior in the contemporary foreign policy. foreign relations quarterly, 13 (1), 175-207. (In Persian) 20.1001.1.20085419.1400.13.1.6.5  
Zibaei, M. & Najafi, S. (2023). Theory of revolution in the Prism of historical sociology of international relations (HSIR). Pizhūhish-i siyāsat-i nazāri, 18 (33), 297 - 322. (In Persian) 
CAPTCHA Image