Iranian Research letter of International Politics

Network-Hybrid Geopolitics and the Power Acquisition of the Islamic Republic of Iran in a State of Complexity of complexity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Farhad Ghasemi 1
Hosain Noroozi 2
ebrahim hajipoor 3

1 . Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, faghasemi@ut.ac.ir

2 . Assistant Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, norooziutir@ut.ac.ir

3 Scientific staff of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

https://doi.org/10.22067/irlip.2025.88440.1543
Abstract
One of the most prominent challenges in explaining the units power taking in the current turbulent world is the fluidization of the global strategic environment, the rapid rate of changes and increasing complexity in the international system, the change in order structures from simple and classic systems to complex and chaotic systems. In these systems, emerging trends and realities and power campaigns have brought out heterogeneity and imbalance in the geopolitics of power and order structures in a very prominent way and turned the processing and reproduction of power into a systemic and network phenomenon. The basic question of this article is: "What is the geopolitical role of the basic network in the empowerment of actors, including Iran, and how is it explained?". In response to this question, this hypothesis is proposed that: "the empowerment of actors, including the Islamic Republic of Iran, in a causal chain in local, regional and global cycles (integration of levels) and different subject areas (intertwining and integration of sectors) based on Network rules and geopolitic networking are done. In this regard, based on the ontological and epistemological foundations of the theory of complexity and chaos and the theoretical propositions contained in it, a new model in finding the power of units is formed under the title of network-hybrid geopolitics. In this framework, the most prominent finding of the research can be conceptualized by using the abductive method approach in presenting a new model of network power arising from networking and geopolitical networking

Keywords

Geopolitics
Network Order
Complexity
Emergence
New International Order
  1. André Barrinha & Thomas Renard, (2017). Cyber-diplomacy: the making of an international society in the digital age, PP 353-364
  2. André. B., & Thomas. R. (2017). Cyber-diplomacy: the making of an international society in the digital age. available at: https://www.tandfonline.com
  3. Autotile and others. Geopolitical Thoughts in the Twentieth Century. Translated by: Mohammad Reza Hafeznia and Hashem Nasiri (2001). Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs Publications (in Persian).
  4. Ayatollah Khamenei. (2015). available at: https:// farsi.khamenei.ir, (in Persian).
  5. Ayatollah Khamenei. (2015). available at: https:// farsi.khamenei.ir, (in Persian).
  6. Bain, F & Xie, Y. (2016). Understanding China Today: An Exploration of Politics, Economics, Society, and International Relation, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  7. Barry Buzan, Reflections on International Security and Security. Definition of International Security Studies. Translated by: Seyyed Ahmad Nekouei (2018). Tehran: Allamah Tabatabaei University Press (in Persian).
  8. BP, Statistical Review Of World Energy. (2022).71st, edition.
  9. Buzan, B.&  Lawson, G. (2013). The Global Transformation: The Nineteenth Century and the Making of Modern International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  10. Cohen, H. S. A. R. (2010). Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness and Function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Dalby, S . (2003). Geopolitics, Security, and America’s new war, geopolitics, available at: https://www.tandfonline.com
  12.  David, C. (2022). Geopolitics and International Relations: Grounding World Politics Anew, University of Antwerp, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden Oston.
  13. Djankov, S, & Miner, S. (2016). China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Motives, Scope and Challenges, Washington D. C: Peterson Institute for International Economics,1-35.
  14. Expediency Council (2003). The Perspective of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the Horizon of 1404 AH, Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly(in Persian).
  15. Final Report, Project for Development of Kyrgyz- Tajikistan- Afghanistan – Iran, KTAI, Road Transport Corridor, P9/ IRU. Economic Cooperation Organization, (2020).
  16. Frank Witlox, (2019), Transport geography and geopolitics: Visions, rules and militarism in China's Belt and Road Initiative and beyond, Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Journal of Transport Geography, p 2
  17. Frank. W. (2019). Transport geography and geopolitics: Visions, rules and militarism in China's Belt and Road Initiative and beyond. Department of Geography. National University of Singapore, Journal of Transport Geography.
  18. Gao, X. Zhang, D., Li, K &, B. (2018). A Cascading Failure Model for Command and Control Networks with Structure, Security and Communication Networks. Paolo,Crucitti, Vito, Latora and Massimo, Marchiori, )2004(, A Model for Cascading in Complex Networks.
  19. Ghasemi F.  (2019) A Step Towards a New Theory of Network Geopolitics and Power Reproduction in International Politics, Foreign Relations Quarterly No. 16 (in Persian).
  20.                 Ghasemi, F. (2020).  A Step Towards a Branch-Dispersive Theoretical Model in New International Politics, Geopolitics Quarterly. (in Persian).
  21.                 Ghasemi, F. (2020). The Power Cycle in the Complex and Chaotic International System and Regional Role Strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Political Quarterly, Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol. 50. (in persian).
  22.                 Ghasemi, F. (2020). Theoretical Requirements of Deterrence in Complex and Chaotic International Systems: A Step Towards a New Theory of Nonlinear Deterrence, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Policy Research, Vol. 10, pp. 141-174 (in Persian).
  23. Graham, F.  The center of the universe: the geopolitics of Iran. Translated by: Abbas Mokhber (2001). Geopolitics of Iran, Markaz Publications (in Persian).
  24. Gregory. F. Tereverton, Seth G. Jones .(2005). Measuring national Power. Published, Rand, National Security, P4.
  25. International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC): The Underlying Causes of US-Iran Tensions,(2025) https://21stcenturywire.com
  26. Jacson, S.F. (2006). China’s Good Neighbor Policy: Relations with Vietnam and Indonesia in Comparative Context. Presented to the International studies Association Annual Meeting. Sandiego. Panel WD20 China Foreign Policy.
  27. Jake. B. R. (2017). Cyber power and cyber effectiveness: An analytic framework, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  28. Jake. B. R. (2022). Cyber Power Is a Key Element of Sea Power, Rebuilding American sea power will require the skillful use of cyber power to prepare the battlespace, fight, and win.  Vol. 148/12/1,438, available at:  https://www.usni.org.
  29. Juan. E. C. (2013). Defense Diplomacy, Chapter 20, The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, Andrew Cooper, Jorge Heine , Ramesh Thakur.
  30. Julia. v. &  et.al. (2022). National Cyber Power Index 2022, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School, available at: https//www.belfercenter.org.
  31. Karen, M.Feigh, Michael,c.Dorneich and Carolin, C. Hayes. (2012). Toward a Characterization of Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Researchers and System Designers. Volume 54.Issue 6.Sage Journal.
  32. Katouzian. H. and Shahidi. H.(eds) (2008). Iran in the 21st Century Politics, Economics & Conflict. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  33. Kennon H. Nakamura &  Susan B. Epstein Foreign Policy Analysts, August 23. (2007). Diplomacy for the 21st Century: Transformational Diplomacy, p 12.
  34. Khanna.  P. Asian Future. Translation: Mohammad Reza Majidi and Mahmoud Javadi (2021). Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies (in Persian).
  35. Khanna. P (2019). The Future Is Asian: Global Order in The Twenty-First Century, Parage. Simon & Schuster.
  36. Khosroopanah, A and a group of researchers (2001). Ayatollah Khamenei's Intellectual System, Center for Strategic Studies Publications (in Persian).
  37. Kissinger, H. (2014). World Order, Reflections on the Character of Nations and the Course of History. Penguin books.
  38. Krickovic. A. &  Igor P. (2021). From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration, SAGE, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1-14
  39. Lai. D. (2011). The United States and China in Power Transition,  Strategic Studies Institute U. S. Army War College.
  40. Leach. D. (2018). Defense Diplomacy- An Important Tool for the Implementation of Foreign Policy and Security of the State, Faculty of National Security War Studies University, Warsaw, Poland.
  41. Maia. C. & Lia, B. (2020). Changing the Place of Clusters in the System of Modern International Economic Relations, Georgian Technical University.
  42. Mearshimer,J.J. (2006). China’s Unpeaceful Rise, 105, 690; Research Library, http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0051.pdf
  43. Mirbagheri, M (2021).  The New Age: A Reading of the Concepts and Strategies of the Statement of the Second Step of the Islamic Revolution, Qom: Publication of the New Islamic Civilization (in Persian).
  44. Mojtahedzadeh, P. (2002). Political Geography and Geographical Politics, Tehran: Samt. (in Persian).
  45. Nadkarni. V. & Noonan. N. C. (2014). Emerging Powers in a Comparative Perspective: The Political and Economic Rise of the BRIC Countries. New York: Bloomsbury Journal of Asian Studies.
  46. Naji.  S. (2011). Iran the Center of Strategic Energy Ellipse, Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2011), p. 155-175 , Published By: Addleton Academic Publishers.
  47. National Cyer Power Index. (2022). Reports & Papers, from Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.
  48. Norouzi, H (2013). Iran and ECO Cultural Capacities, Tehran: Research Institute for Culture, Art and Communication. (in Persian).
  49. Norouzi, H (2023). BRICS New Development Bank, A Reflection on Institutional Rationality and Functional Fascination, Journal of Country Studies (in Persian).
  50. Norouzi. H. (2021). China and the Longing for Making Order; An Insight toward Emergence and Reliability of the AIIB, Journal of World Sociopolitical Studies| Vol. 5| No. 4. (in Persian)
  51. Nye Jr, Joseph S. (2012). The Future of Power, World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, Vol. 16, No. 4
  52. Patton. S & Sato. J, (2023), Asia Power Snapshot: China and the United States in Southeast Asia
  53. Paul. K. H. (1999). Deterrence and International Conflict: Empirical Findings and Theoretical Debates, Annual Review of Political Science.
  54. Peter. B. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies. London and New York: Routledge, 32-41.
  55. Pomerlyan, E and Belitski, M. (2023). Regional Integration and Economic Performance: Evidence from the Eurasian Economy Union. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  56. Richard. H. (2018). A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order, Penguin Books, New York, NY,  179.
  57. Sanderson. I. (2000). Evaluation in Complex Policy System. Evaluation. 6(4), 433-454.
  58. Shu-Yun. M. (2007). Political Science at the Edge of Chaos? The Paradigmatic Implications of Historical Institutionalism, International Political Science Review / Revue international de science politique, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Jan., 2007), pp. 57-78.
  59. Spyckman. N.J. (1944). The Geography of Peace, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  60. Stunkel. O. (2015). The BRICS and the Future of Global Order. Reprint ed. London: Lexington Books.
  61. Susannah. P. Jack. S. &  Herve. L. (2023). Asia Power Index.. Key Findings Report, Lowy Institute, P6
  62. The Department of Defense Indo-Pacific Strategy Report Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region. (2019).
  63. The Future Is Asian: Global Order in The Twenty-First Century, Parage, Khanna,2019
  64. V. T. Tsakanyan. (2017). The Role of Cybersecurity in World Politics, Vestink RUDN. International Relations, Vol.17 No.2, 339-348.
  65. Vinokurov, Evgeny & Alexander Liman. (2012). Eurasia and Eurasian Integration: Beyond the post- Soviet Border, The Economics of the post- Soviet and Eurasian Integration, Eurasian Development Bank, Eurasian Integration Yearbook.
  66. Vladimir M. Morozov. (2023). Network Diplomacy, Contributing to Peace in the 21st Century.
  67. Yasir Rashid. (2021). ITI Corridor and Its Importance for the Regional Trade, Center for Iranian Studies in Ankara İRAM
  68. Yıldırır Keser, H. (2015), Importance of Transport Corridors in Regional Development: The Case of TRACECA, Sosyoekonomi, Vol. 23(24), 163-182.
  69. Rahbari, 2015, The third clause of the decree for the members of the second term of the Supreme Council of Cyberspace
  70. Criekemans. D. (2022). Geopolitics and International Relations: Grounding World Politics Anew.
Send comment about this article
Enter Name.
Enter a valid email address.
Enter a vaid affiliation.
Enter comments (At leaset 10 words)
CAPTCHA Image
Enter Security Code Correctly.

  • Receive Date 21 June 2024
  • Revise Date 29 October 2024
  • Accept Date 08 June 2025

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Journal statistical information

Contact Us